New College Board Research: Faculty Express Near-Universal Concern That Student AI Use Undermines Original Writing and Critical Thinking – Newsroom
Overview

Added
March 8, 2026
Related situation
Audience
parent
Grade range
Grade 9 (Freshman)–Grade 12 (Senior)
Page kind
Article
Introduction
College Board Research: Faculty Perspectives on Generative AI
- Survey Scope: Conducted in summer 2025, surveying over 3,000 U.S. college faculty members regarding the impact of generative AI in higher education.
- Widespread Student Use:
- 74% of faculty report students using AI to write essays or papers.
- 67% report students using AI to paraphrase or rewrite content.
- Nearly 50% of faculty believe at least half of their students use AI for writing tasks.
- Primary Concerns:
- 92% of faculty are concerned about plagiarism and academic dishonesty.
- 88% are concerned about student overreliance on automation.
- 84% agree that AI undermines critical thinking, originality, and deep engagement with course material.
- Faculty Sentiment & Usage:
- Overall sentiment is more negative (45%) than positive (34%).
- Despite concerns, 77% of faculty have used AI in their own professional roles.
- Institutional and Disciplinary Divides:
- Selectivity: Faculty at highly selective institutions report higher student AI use and greater concern; faculty at open-enrollment colleges are more likely to view AI as a practical instructional tool.
- Disciplines: Humanities/writing-intensive faculty report the highest levels of disruption and negative sentiment. STEM and business faculty are more likely to use AI professionally and hold positive views.
- Guidance and Policy Challenges:
- 72% of faculty face challenges managing student AI use.
- Only 21% feel "very confident" in guiding AI use in their classrooms.
- 79% of faculty state they are still exploring or need further guidance on how to manage AI.
- Less than half of faculty have established formal classroom policies regarding AI.
- Contextual Research: This report follows two 2025 College Board briefs on high school AI usage, which highlighted an emerging digital divide and inconsistent policy implementation across secondary education.
Community reviews
No published reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.